Characteristics of heroes woe from mind. Speech characteristics of the heroes of the comedy "Woe from Wit" Griboedova A.S. Insane you glorified me with all the chorus

In Russian classics, Griboyedov is known as the author of the first comedy, combining examples of classicism and realism, although he had other comedies created earlier. Previously created plays included the beginnings of a combination of different styles to found a new, but the true result of an innovative genre was Griboedov's work "Woe from Wit". The author came up with the idea of ​​the play in 1820, significant help in describing the characters was provided by the stories of his long-time girlfriend, E. B. Grekhova.

Characteristics of the heroes "Woe from Wit"

main characters

Chatsky	Positive comedy hero. He was brought up in the Famusov family, having reached the age of majority, he began to live separately. A young nobleman with sharp mind and insight, he has a noble soul and lofty thoughts. Condemns the views of Famusov, and therefore the entire noble society. He passionately loves his homeland and his people, his pride is offended by the mocking attitude of foreigners to everything Russian. In love with Sophia, having learned about her love for the insignificant Molchalin, he is disappointed both in her and in society, leaves Moscow.
Famusov	A wealthy landowner, a widower, brings up his daughter Sophia. Supporter of the old way of life. The main features of his character are servility and servility. He is scrupulous about public opinion about his person and about his family. He is an opponent of Chatsky in disputes about views on life. He dreams of marrying his daughter to Skalozub. Flirting with the maid.
Sofia	The naive and trusting daughter of Pavel Afanasyevich. She was brought up and educated in the best traditions of the noble society of Moscow. I didn’t understand Chatsky’s real feelings, she was in love with Molchalin. Plays the piano, reads French novels. Sophia is the image of a brave and determined girl, she has a strong character.
Molchalin	The characterization of the hero contains only negative epithets. Serves as Famusov's secretary, a man with a petty, vile little soul. Cold hypocrite, unprincipled and stupid sycophant. Calculating and cowardly. Born in a poor family, he dreams of getting into the "higher" society. In love with the maid Lisa. Worships Tatyana Yurievna.
Puffer	Not a very smart man, a wealthy bachelor, not yet old. Serves as a colonel, an ordinary "martinet", dreams of a career as a general, his whole life is in the army. Known in Moscow circles.

Minor characters

Lisa	A windy girl, a servant in the Famusov house, playful, cheerful. She likes the barman Petrusha. Famusov favorably treats her. Covers his mistress Sophia.
Repetilov	An old friend of Chatsky, his parody display. A simple-minded, stupid, ordinary person.
Zagoretsky	I enter Famusov's house, a secular person, superficial, stupid, a swindler and a rogue.
Khlestov	Pavel Afanasyevich's sister-in-law, a malicious lonely old woman, from loneliness started a pack of dogs and a bunch of pets.
Platon Mikhailovich Gorich	A friend of Chatsky, disappointed in marrying a young woman, dutifully submits to her. Retired soldier.
Natalya Dmitrievna Gorich	The young wife of Gorich, a lover of balls, takes care of her husband to the point of importunity.
Prince Tugoukhovsky	A deaf old man, a friend of Famusov, the goal of life is to profitably attach his six daughters.
Princess Tugoukhovskaya	The wife of the prince, supports the views of Famusov, an opponent of education, dreams of a profitable party for her daughters.
Countess Hryumina	Their names are unknown, their role is insignificant. An elderly grandmother goes to balls with her granddaughter, hoping to marry her off.
Maxim Petrovich	The late uncle of Pavel Afanasyevich, his vivid role model.
Parsley	Servant, knows the basics of literacy, helps the owner to take notes, untidy.

In Woe from Wit, the characters, one of which is Chatsky, show the conflict of generations. Also in this play there are off-stage characters, the list of which includes representatives of Moscow society. The main characters of "Woe from Wit", except for Chatsky, have no prototypes, in some minor characters the features of the author's contemporaries from the literary society are expressed. This table, in which the characterization of the characters is given, can help in presenting a summary of the play.

useful links

See what else we have:

Artwork test

gorichi

Young lady Natalya Dmitrievna and her husband Platon Mikhailovich. Both are old acquaintances of Chatsky, which becomes known in the 5th phenomenon of the third act. Gorichey Griboyedov portrays, ironically smiling.

Chatsky
You are younger, you have become fresher;
Fire, blush, laughter, play in every way.
Natalya Dmitrievna
I'm married.
Chatsky
Long ago you would say!

Tugoukhovskie

The Tugoukhovskys are among the first to come to Famusov's ball. They are married and came here mainly to find rich suitors for their daughters. Chatsky also falls into their field of vision, but since he is not rich, they quickly lose interest in Chatsky. Prince Tugoukhovsky, following the logic of his surname, is deaf. Almost all of his lines are interjections. He is henpecked, he does not disobey his wife in anything. The princess is distinguished by an evil disposition and causticity.

Khryumina

Countess Hryumina: grandmother and granddaughter. The granddaughter is an evil old maid. Chatsky responds to her caustic remarks no less sharply. He compares her with French milliners.

Zagoretsky

A special place in the comedy is occupied by Repetilov and Zagoretsky. Critics attribute them to minor characters, but they are not his ardent defenders, they obviously do nothing wrong to Chatsky, but it is their "tacit consent" that decides important questions in the lives of other people. Zagoretsky is presented by the author as a frequenter of living rooms and dining rooms, "a liar, a gambler and a thief."

Tugoukhovsky, Khryumin, Zagoretsky - a satire on the Moscow society of those times.

Repetilov

Repetilov appears in the comedy in the fourth act as a guest at Famusov's ball. Griboedov in "Woe from Wit" gives telling surnames to many characters, so in translation from French the surname Repetilov means "repeat". So the author emphasizes that Repetilov is only able to repeat in words the high ideas of the Decembrists, without delving into their true meaning. He becomes the central figure of the fourth act. Guests leaving the ball stop near him, starting with Chatsky, and from the conversations of the guests with Repetilov, gossip about madness reaches him.

The comedy "Woe from Wit" belongs to those few works that do not lose their value in our time.

Composition based on the story "Woe from Wit" - Grade 9

Option 1

At the beginning of the century before last, A.S. Griboyedov was written. Oddly enough, this work remains relevant to this day. Reading "Woe from Wit", you can meet today's heroes in it. The author reveals the vices of Russian society.

One of the main characters of the comedy is the Moscow gentleman Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov. He largely depends on public opinion and traditions, he likes to teach the youth, to take an example from the elders. And as an example to follow, Pavel Afanasyevich himself had his late uncle Maxim Petrovich - a nobleman who did not hesitate to fawn and bow in order to gain benefits.

Famusov occupies a high position and does not hide the fact that he serves only to receive ranks and all sorts of benefits, without delving into the essence of the signed papers. He is the patronage of his relatives, spreading "nepotism" and bureaucracy in the service. And he measures people by income level and teaches this to his daughter Sophia.

Molchalin and Skalozub also think. Their main goal is to achieve beautiful life through sycophancy and servility. They curry favor with their superiors, receiving career growth and position in society. Molchalin is a cynic without any moral values ​​who will go "on the heads". And Skalozub is a ossified, narcissistic ignoramus, he, like the rest, is chasing ranks.

However, in contrast to the negative heroes, Griboyedov created the image of Chatsky, who opposes servility, serfdom, careerism and cruelty. This hero seeks to convey to people the ideas of service to the cause, mutual respect, labor, prosperity of art and science. He acts as an extraordinary person who does not fit into the Famus society. For this he is considered crazy.

Unfortunately, in our time there are also enough people like Famusov, Skalozub and Molchalin. They keep the bureaucracy and corruption. Such people live much better than smart, honest and conscientious people. It seems to me that as long as there are such characters in power, it will not be possible to build a truly democratic society.

Option 2

It will not be a secret for anyone that Alexander Sergeevich is a very famous and capable playwright, but his work in schools is not studied deeply enough and seriously enough. The most famous work that the school curriculum gives us is the comedy of A.S. Griboyedov. And it provides a picture of the mores of that time, where the contrast between the younger generation and older conservatives is clearly visible.

And although the era of Griboyedov is a time of change, and more than one generation has changed since the day this comedy was written, human values ​​have remained unchanged to this day.

The author describes the period when wise, truthful and decent people, like his hero Chatsky, appear before the eyes of society. Such people are able to rebel against the existing order, the old society of lies and selfishness. Griboyedov belonged to such people and expressed his thoughts and beliefs in his hero in the comedy Woe from Wit.

A tireless fighter against injustice, lies, self-esteem, the exposer of deceit, Chatsky is the main character of Griboedov's comedy "Woe from Wit". But, probably, the society was not yet fully prepared for the truth, and therefore it was difficult for Chatsky, since he was a victim in an unequal struggle. Apparently, the time for change has not yet come, and therefore it is difficult for Chatsky to fight against the old force. He tries to open Sophia's eyes to the lies and deceit of Molchalin, to depict the whole essence of the Famus society, its injustice and blindness.

A.S. Griboyedov wrote a wonderful work about the struggle of two generations, which had a huge impact on the society of that time. With the help of subtle humor, the author revealed in comedy all the injustice, lies, arbitrariness and ignorance that society was saturated with.

In the comedy Woe from Wit, Griboyedov touched on the eternal problem of fathers and children and laughed at things that are not so funny at first glance. But the author considers laughter to be a very correct weapon in the fight against the vices of an outdated society.

These negative traits are also inherent in the people of the present generation. But with all these problems in the work, the author gives us hope for "light at the end of the tunnel", thanks to such educated people as Chatsky. And the more people like the protagonist of this comedy, the faster the Famus society will be defeated.

Option 3

One of the best works the beginning of the nineteenth century is deservedly considered “Woe from Wit”. Its author, Alexander Sergeevich Griboedov, a Russian poet, diplomat and playwright, has repeatedly said that he wrote Woe from Wit as a light comedy of manners only for the sake of the ambition of a secular person who wanted to see his offspring on stage. However, one should not forget that comedies of a “moral” content, reflecting inertia, exposing the hypocrisy and falsity of secular society, were considered very important and necessary in those circles of the opposition-minded nobility to which the author belonged.

In this sharp and, undoubtedly, political work, all the narrow-mindedness and narrow-mindedness of noble Russia was so sharply and decisively shown that the comedy was staged completely, without censorship, only thirty-five years after Griboyedov's death. It was praised by progressive critics as imbued with a spirit of patriotism and freethinking. The brilliant aphorisms that fill the comedy had a huge impact on enlightened minds on the eve of the Decembrist uprising. Thanks to the author of the comedy, “Who are the judges?”, “Carriage for me, carriage!” and the classic eternally feminine “Here reluctantly drove me crazy!”.

The images of a cautious little man, with all his might, without relatives and connections, making a career of Molchalin, who wants high and bright love, but Sophia did not notice her, preoccupied only with talking about himself Famusov - these images were written out by Griboedov with great skill and ideally reflected the most common types of thinking.

The author managed to combine in the work “Woe from Wit” a high feeling and a limited mind, to show how urgently the consciousness of the “Famous society” needs changes, how hard it is for a fresh person in it, not shackled by the conventions that became the meaning of life for many nobles of that time.

Comedy has themes of love and lyrics, political satire, philosophy. All these themes are united around the main character Chatsky, and it is he who reflects the main property of comedy - the unity of comedy and tragedy.

The meaning of the name of the comedy "Woe from Wit" - composition, grade 9

Option 1

After reading A. Griboyedov's comedy "Woe from Wit", we were faced with universal problems that are relevant in our time. The main conflict is the clash between the progressive-minded Alexander Chatsky and the royal nobility. Main character opposes servility, servility and duplicity in the person of Famusov, Molchalin, Skalozub and the like.

In his work, Griboyedov divides the heroes into two completely opposite camps, thereby wanting to show us what kind of people we can be surrounded by. Famus society is a terrible, primitive world full of lies and deceit. He is opposed by the kind, fair and bright world of Chatsky.

The Famusov society can be attributed to people who live by the same principles as Famusov. These are stupid, uneducated people. For them, there are no such concepts as honor, nobility, justice. They live in their own world, where duplicity and flattery. Where a person is respected not for his personal merits, but only for his condition and position. They live in monotony, and it suits them. However, they are all happy in their own way.

Indeed, thanks to their stupidity, they do not think about life, they are all opposed by the educated, determined, with high moral ideas Chatsky. Griboedov shows us that one really smart person can never prove anything to these primitive people, it's not worth wasting your strength on it.

Even the title of the work can reveal to us the genius of the main idea of ​​the comedy. Indeed, it is much more difficult for a smart person to live. This comedy will forever remain an immortal work in Russian literature. She left a deep mark on my soul.

Option 2

The very name of the comedy speaks for itself. Woe from the mind, which concludes in a person who has a mind unlike others. Although the author does not show exactly who is stupid.

The play itself is built on the personification of the narrow framework of classicism. We are confronted with a clearly expressed conflict of oppositions. different types mind. The work arbitrarily begs the question of interest to many readers, what is the mind? What is its standard? Which hero is smart, unlike others? In the play, each character tries to reason logically about what the mind represents for a person. There is no standard of mind in the author's play, which means that there are no smartest ones, that is, winners.

The first hero is a positive one, distinguished from others by the fact that he is more humane, more sensitive than other heroes. It cannot be said that he is smarter than everyone. First of all, he is generous and noble. For Chatsky, mind and feeling are in the first place, and this is his grief from the mind, which is called in the light by feeling. Chatsky is incomprehensible to the Famus society only because he does not want to change or even condemn something. Each person has the right to his own opinion, to his position in life, as our positive hero argues. He is a man of his word, honor, valor, faith, truth. The Famus society is attacking him, that a young man cannot reconcile himself to living in such a society and decides to go abroad.

Famusov is the negative character in the play. His characteristic features are deceitful, stupid, ignorant, however, like the entire Famus society. They have no desire to overcome their shortcomings. In a word, these people are toadies and fools.

What is the meaning of the play itself? What did the author want to say?

The meaning of the title of the play says that the positive hero suffers from the fact that he does not want to be like the society in which he lives. He fights for truth, honor, loyalty, freedom, love and friendship. The comedy is addressed not to the Famusovs, but to Chatsky, who is funny and lonely. He called him "smart", thus ridiculing the understanding of what mind means in a person.

Comedy itself is unconventional for that time. The writer shows the social environment, problems affecting the society of that time. At the same time, the writer makes fun of Famus' stupid and ridiculous society in which he lived. This is the main point of the comedy play.

Option 3

Initially, Griboyedov wanted to call his own comedy "Woe to the Wit", that is, he hinted at a certain decline that is inevitably present in society, perhaps, as if to warn his contemporaries against further developments. Such a name looks like a warning slogan, because if the mind is in grief, then where it was, stupidity will arise, that is, the absence of the mind. Nevertheless, in the future, the author renames the play into "Woe from Wit", that is, he indicates the reason and, for readers, briefly describes the story of the protagonist.

Chatsky is a representative of the very mind from which grief arises. If the mind exists separately in the form of ideas, then, as such, it can not give grief, but if it receives its embodiment in such a figure as Chatsky, then this hero will have to endure various sufferings and experience grief. In fact, in fact, this is the fate of any prophets and carriers of progressive ideas, not without reason there is such a saying about the absence of prophets in their own country.

Griboyedov writes about a completely understandable truth that many people know: if you try to be clever a lot, then often nothing good comes of it. The protagonist of the work actively argues with the rest of the characters, he tries to prove something to them, but in the end he does not get any significant progress, his antithesis of simple worldly wisdom does not bring anything positive. The most important thing is that it will almost never bring, this simply does not happen in society.

For ordinary people, the elementary comfort of life, which Famusov embodies in its highest limit, is much more appropriate. It is he who considers the position in society and the presence of valuable capital to be the highest achievement. Most people strive for this, as it gives quite tangible benefits.

Of course, judging by the mind, the ideals that Chatsky preaches, that is, culture and personal development, are more valuable. They are the very mind that actually appears to be the highest value, but the mind (in the sense of some ideal) is not so practical, it does not bring significant benefits. More utilitarian views that Famusov and other participants in this system of the upper strata of society are bringing benefits.

Surprisingly, but Chatsky is not just a smart person, but also a lot of a patriot who is trying for the sake of his country. Nevertheless, practical Famusovs will not listen to such ephemeral reasoning like “and who are the judges ..” they will listen to the call of their own benefit and comfort.

Characteristics of the current century based on the work "Woe from Wit"

Griboedov's comedy "Woe from Wit" was written in the first half of the 19th century. Its main conflict is social, ideological: the clash between the “current century” and the “past century”. Chatsky himself, the main character of the comedy, can be attributed to the first, and the entire Famus society to the second. Let us consider the main issues in which the opinions of these parties radically diverge.

Probably the most burning of them is the attitude to wealth and ranks. The Famus society is of the opinion that "in order to get ranks, there are many channels." For Chatsky, the only way is to serve the Fatherland, but not to the officials. Confirmation of this is his famous phrase: "I would be glad to serve - it's sickening to serve."

Naturally, for officials great importance has continuity, for example:

... we have been doing it from time immemorial,

that according to father and son honor;

Be bad, yes if you get it

Souls of a thousand two tribal, -Here is the groom.

And at this time Chatsky asks:

Where, show us, Fathers of the Fatherland,

Which should we take as samples?

Are not these rich in robbery?

We see that he would like to have a worthy role model, some kind of ideal, then we can say with confidence that in his passionate speeches he would speak about his ancestors with pride, and not with bitterness. He would be glad to have some kind of support in his judgments, but he has a completely different society in front of him, which cannot give him this support, and poor Chatsky has no choice but to try alone to prove to others that they are wrong. In fact, he stands alone against the whole of Moscow, so his positions and points of view are doomed to failure in advance. But with a stubbornness worthy of, perhaps, reproach, or perhaps admiration, he fights for his views on life. He is not at all afraid to express an honest and provocative opinion that "the world began to grow stupid":

Fresh tradition, but hard to believe;

As he was famous for, whose neck bent more often;

As not in the war, but in the world they took it with their foreheads,

Knocked on the floor without regret!

Who needs: those arrogance, they lie in the dust,

And for those who are higher, flattery, like lace, was woven.

Direct was the age of humility and fear,

All under the guise of zeal for the king.

For Famusov himself, the opinion of the world is important. He only cares about the reputation of a respectable person, but only to maintain external decorum. They speak with Chatsky, practically not listening to each other.

The next question is the attitude to education and upbringing. Famusov himself spoke quite eloquently:

Learning is the plague, learning is the cause

What is now more than ever,

Crazy divorced people, and deeds, and opinions.

Chatsky, of course, is sure of the opposite. And here it is appropriate to mention foreigners, who at that time were often teachers. He ridicules them:

Oh! Let's move on to education.

What is now, just as of old,

Trouble recruiting teachers regiments,

More in number, cheaper price?

Not that they are far in science;

In Russia, under a great fine,

We are told to recognize each

Historian and geographer!

Our mentor, remember his cap, bathrobe,

Index finger, all signs of learning

How our timid minds disturbed,

As we used to believe from an early age,

That there is no salvation for us without the Germans!

The Famusov Society does not accept any innovations. Therefore, his opinion on the issue of serfdom diverges from the position of Chatsky:

That Nestor, a scoundrel from the nobles,

Crowd surrounded by servants;

Both his life and honor saved him more than once: suddenly

He traded three greyhounds for them!!!

Or the one over there, which is for pranks

He drove to the fortress ballet on many wagons

From mothers, fathers of rejected children?!

He himself is immersed in mind in Zephyrs and Cupids,

Made all of Moscow marvel at their beauty!

But the debtors did not agree to the postponement:

Cupids and Zephyrs are all SOLD OUT!!!

And what is the attitude of the characters towards love? Chatsky explains with Sophia, saying: "And yet I love you without memory." But Sofya, although his age, belongs more to the Famus society than to supporters of Chatsky's crazy ideas. Having a “bookish” upbringing, she prefers the quiet Molchalin to him, who loves her “by position”. To this, Chatsky accurately remarks: “After all, now they love the dumb.”

By the end of the comedy, the situation is escalating, more and more representatives of old Moscow are speaking out against Chatsky. Sophia does not accept his courtship. He remains completely alone. Why? Because the environment of the people in which he fell is very conservative. It lives according to its own laws, which do not suit such an honest and decent Chatsky. He does not accept them, therefore, society does not accept Chatsky himself. He is an innovator in his essence, a supporter of transformations, and the Famus society does not accept them as such. It is not surprising that Chatsky is declared crazy. Indeed, in the eyes of old Moscow, he, with his crazy ideas and revealing speeches, looks like that. In desperation, he delivers his last monologue:

So! I sobered up completely

Dreams out of sight - and the veil fell;

Now it would not be bad in a row

For daughter and father

And for a fool's lover

And pour out all the bile and all the annoyance on the whole world.

Who was he with? Where did fate take me?

Everyone is racing! Everyone curse! crowd of tormentors,

In the love of traitors, in the enmity of the tireless

Indomitable storytellers,

Clumsy wise men, crafty simpletons,

Sinister old women, old men,

decrepit over fiction, nonsense, -

Insane you glorified me with all the chorus.

You are right: he will come out of the fire unharmed,

Who will have time to spend the day with you,

Breathe the air alone

And his mind will survive.

Chatsky, with all his restless desire to change the world, is not able to do it alone. Probably, even at the end of the comedy, he does not understand this, blaming everyone around, annoyed that he could not do anything. No, this does not mean at all that he himself is to blame for this situation, but his harshness and excessive frankness could not but play a role in this sleek society. Of course, he does what befits a romantic: he retires with dignity to “where there is a corner for an offended feeling,” but he does not become a romantic to the end precisely because he shifts all the blame on everyone around him. Nothing will change with his departure. The ranks will continue to receive sycophancy and with the help of patronage, foreigners will continue to be loved and considered historians and geographers, girls will continue to grow up on novels and choose quiet and mysterious silent ones for their husbands. He did not turn the world upside down, did not break the old Moscow. The “age of the past” still remained stronger. But he would not have been Chatsky if he had not tried so desperately to fight for his happiness. Perhaps he will find it somewhere far from Moscow, where he will be understood and accepted.

Option 2

Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov wrote a brilliant work that had a tremendous impact on all Russian literature. This work deservedly occupies an exceptional place, because this is the first realistic comedy in the entire history of Russian literature. Griboyedov was able to depict with amazing accuracy the main conflict of the era, when the conservative forces of society and new people who had new trends collided. For the first time in the history of Russian literature, not one vice of society is ridiculed, but all at once: this is serfdom, the inherent sycophancy with careerism, bureaucracy, which was just emerging, widespread martyrdom, simply low level education. Add to this admiration for everything that was foreign, cringing and the value of not personal human qualities, but his ranks and financial condition.

The main representative of the "current century" in Griboedov's work is Alexander Andreevich Chatsky. This young man has good images, he understands that the Fatherland is ripe for change and, first of all, it is necessary to deal with changes in the minds of people. Chatsky's confrontation with the Famus society begins, which is not set up for any changes at all. In society, they are afraid of any progressive ideas, because free-thinking thoughts can interfere with their peaceful existence.

The main representative of this society is Famusov. According to the laws of life, he is not a stupid person, an official, but he is an ardent opponent of everything new. Famusov protests against the manifestation of thoughts about freedom (whatever it may be), liberty and new ideas. The society that Famusov represents is confident that any education is absolutely unnecessary. But foreigners with everything foreign for Famusov and his ilk were a real ideal. Famusov himself is a very mercenary person, therefore, even in the groom for his daughter Sophia, he looked with benefit for himself.

The main characters of "Woe from Wit"

The main characters of the comedy

Despite the large number of heroes, the main action in the comedy is centered around four characters - Chatsky, Famusov, Sofya, Molchalin.

Alexander Andreevich Chatsky

This is a young nobleman who was left an orphan at an early age. His upbringing was handled by a family friend, Famusov. Having matured, Chatsky begins an independent life.

He spent three years abroad and, after returning from a trip, visits his tutor Famusov and his daughter Sonya, for whom he has tender feelings and with whom he hopes to marry. However, the picture he saw greatly discouraged him - Famusov was far from that childhood memory of his teachers.

Thanks to a trip abroad, Chatsky was able to learn about excellent relationships between people and their goals in life, so the corrupt aristocracy, mired in clichés and empty, meaningless actions, disgusts Chatsky. Attempts to explain his position and convince others of the opposite Chatsky do not lead to success - at the end of the work he leaves Moscow, because he sees no other way out.

Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov

Famusov is the tutor of Alexander Chatsky. At the time of the story, he is the manager of a state institution. His wife died long ago, leaving him a daughter, Sophia. The image of Famusov is very contradictory, on the one hand, he is a person who is not devoid of positive qualities of character - for example, he takes Alexander up after the death of his parents and treats him like his son. On the other hand, he is a dishonest and hypocritical person. The main measure of success and decency of a person for him is financial security and a high position. Famusov is a bribe taker and a deceiver, which is why he has a conflict with his pupil.

Sofia Famusova

Sophia is the daughter of Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov. In the comedy, she is already depicted as an adult - a girl of marriageable age.

Despite the fact that she is not so mired in the aristocratic swamp, the girl is still partly a negative character - her disregard for true feelings repels this character.

The girl loves to be pleased, and she cares little for the fact that such behavior looks humiliating.

Alexey Stepanovich Molchalin

Molchalin is Famusov's personal secretary, although officially he is an archive worker at the state institution where Famusov works. Molchalin is a simple person by origin, therefore, for the sake of the title and the right to belong to high society, he is ready for anything. Molchalin pleases Famusov and his daughter in every way to make his dream come true. In fact, this is a hypocritical, stupid and dishonest person.

Minor characters

This category includes characters who have a significant influence on the formation of the plot of a comedy, but they are not active characters. In addition, this also includes heroes who have too generalized and vague character traits, such as Lisa.

Repetilov

Repetilov is an old friend of Famusov. During his youth, he led a dissolute and stormy life, indulging himself in balls and social pastimes. Due to absent-mindedness and lack of concentration, he was unable to ensure his career growth.

Sergei Sergeevich Skalozub

Puffer is a rich officer. By nature, he is a prominent person, but stupid and uninteresting. Puffer too obsessed with military service and his career and sees no point in anything else.

Lisa

Lisa is a young girl, a servant in the Famusov house. She has an attractive appearance, which in her case turns into a negative feature - Famusov and Molchalin pester her. Life in Famusov's house in Lisa's case is further complicated by a difficult relationship with Sophia - Famusov's daughter from time to time draws Lisa into her love affairs, which can cause serious problems for the latter.

Third party characters

The largest number of characters in the comedy, whose action takes a fragmentary, episodic period of time. However, it cannot be said that their presence in the text is unjustified - in fact, they play a very important role. With their help, the image of the main types of personalities of an aristocratic society and the main negative qualities of representatives of this stratum takes place.

Anton Antonovich Zagoretsky

Zagoretsky became famous in society as a rogue and a deceiver - he has an extraordinary passion for playing cards, but always plays in a dishonest way. In addition, Anton Antonovich prefers to lead an active social life - he is a regular person in theaters, at balls and dinner parties.

Anfisa Nilovna Khlestova

Anfisa Nilovna is Famusov's relative. At the time of the story, she is already an old woman. Khlestova was once a maid of honor, but now, in her old age, she has become useless to anyone.

Because of this dissatisfaction with life, the old woman has acquired a bad temper and is an extremely unpleasant person.

Her house is full of young girls whom she has adopted and dogs - such company makes her seem important and necessary and entertains the old woman in her hours of despondency.

Platon Mikhailovich Gorich

Not all representatives of the aristocracy are people with leveled qualities. An example of people who have retained their moral character is Platon Mikhailovich Gorich. He is a kind and sincere person, with a sound mind and the ability to reflect, however, he has a too soft character, which made him a confident henpecked.

Natalya Dmitrievna Gorich

Natalya Dmitrievna is Platon Mikhailovich's wife. A woman is much younger than her husband, and in contrast to him, she has a special love for secular life, which terribly burdens her husband, but Gorich cannot resist the desires of his wife.

Pyotr Ilyich Tugoukhovsky

The surname of Pyotr Ilyich fully corresponds to his essence, or rather to his physical defect. The prince is terribly hard of hearing, which greatly complicates his life. Hearing problems have become the reason that Pyotr Ilyich is rarely in public, and his wife has become the commander of her husband and their life in general.

Maria Alekseevna Tugoukhovskaya

Marya Alekseevna is Pyotr Ilyich's wife. They had 6 daughters in marriage. They are all unmarried girls, at the time of the story. The prince and princess are forced to constantly appear with their daughters in public in order to successfully marry off their daughters, but so far the hopes of these nobles have not been justified.

Countess Hryumina

Under the name of the Countess Khryumins, the grandmother and granddaughter are hiding. The main emphasis in the comedy of the two of them is on the granddaughter, who remained an old maid, and therefore she is always angry and offended by the whole world.

The Grandmother Countess is a decrepit old woman who can no longer afford dinner parties and balls, but she still tries to attend them, apparently in order to find a husband for her granddaughter.

Parsley

The image of Petrushka, although in no way connected with aristocrats, since this character is a simple peasant by origin, nevertheless, in terms of his importance in the comedy, Petrushka should be ranked among the third-rate characters.

Petrushka works as a barmaid in Famusov's house - he is a poor man, but a pure soul. His maid Lisa is in love with him.

Thus, in Griboedov's comedy "Woe from Wit" we can see a kaleidoscope of various characters. Basically, the author does not describe in detail their characters, but this does not interfere with the perception of comedy and understanding the essence of the work.

An essay about the Famus society "Woe from Wit"

Option 1

“In a group of twenty faces reflected ...

all former Moscow…”

I.A. Goncharov

A.S. Griboedov shows a broad picture of life in the 10-20s of the 19th century, reproducing the social struggle that unfolded between advanced, Decembrist-minded people; and the conservative masses of the nobility. This group of nobles makes up the Famus society.

The people of this circle are staunch supporters of the autocratic-feudal system. The age of Catherine II is dear to them, when the power of the noble landowners was especially strong. In the famous “ode to servility”, Famusov admires the nobleman Maxim Petrovich, who “ate not only on silver, but on gold”. He achieved honor, fame, accumulated wealth, showing servility, servility. This is what Famusov credits him with and considers him a role model.

Representatives of the Famus society live in the past, their “judgments are drawn from the forgotten newspapers of the times of the Ochakovskys and the conquest of the Crimea.” They sacredly protect their selfish interests, value a person by his origin, rank, wealth, and not by business qualities. Famusov says: "... we have long been saying that honor is due to father and son." Countess Tugoukhovskaya loses interest in Chatsky as soon as she finds out that he is not a chamber junker and is not rich.

Famusov and his like-minded people are cruel to their serfs, do not consider them to be people, dispose of their destinies at their own discretion. So, for example, Chatsky is outraged by the landowner, who exchanged his faithful servants, who more than once saved “both his honor and his life”, for “three greyhounds”. And the noble lady Khlestova, who came to the ball, “out of boredom took a black-haired girl and a dog.” She does not make any difference between them and asks Sofya: “Tell them to feed them, my friend, a handout came down from dinner.”

The author of the comedy notes that for Famusov and his friends, service is a source of income, a means of achieving ranks and honors. Famusov himself treats his business in a careless manner: “My custom is this: signed, so off your shoulders.” He saves a warm place for his relatives and promotes their promotion through the ranks. Colonel Skalozub also pursues personal, not state interests. For him, all means are good, only "if only he got into the generals."

Careerism, servility, sycophancy, servility - all these qualities are inherent in the officials depicted in the comedy. They are most clearly manifested in the image of Molchalin, Famusov's secretary, a “business man”, who, thanks to his “helpfulness”, “lack of words”, “received three awards”.

It should be noted that Famusov and his guests are bright enemies of enlightenment, since they believe that all evil comes from him. Famusov says:

Learning is the plague, learning is the cause.

What is now more than ever,

Crazy divorced people, and deeds, and opinions ...

The same opinion is shared by Skalozub, Khlestova, Princess Tugoukhovskaya.

The conservative society of noble landlords, depicted by A.S. Griboedov, is afraid of progress, which threatens his dominant position. That is why they so unanimously condemn Chatsky and his views, consider him a conductor of "crazy deeds and opinions."

Option 2

The comedy "Woe from Wit" was written by Griboyedov in 1824. It gives a general picture of all Russian life in the 1910s-1920s, reproduces the eternal struggle between the old and the new, which unfolded with particular force at that time not only in Moscow, but throughout Russia between two camps: advanced, Decembrist-minded people "of the present century" and the feudal lords, representatives of the "past century".

All images of the comedy are deeply realistic. Famusov, Skalozub, Molchalin, Khlestova, the rogue Zagoretsky - all of them are a reflection of reality. These people are stupid and mercenary, afraid of enlightenment and progress, their thoughts are directed only to the acquisition of honors and titles, wealth and finery, they form a single camp of reaction that tramples on all living things.

Famus society is traditional. His life foundations are such that one must study, “looking at the elders”, destroy free-thinking thoughts, serve with obedience to the authorities, and most importantly, be rich. The ideals of this society are presented in Famusov's monologues:

...here is an example:

The deceased was a respectable chamberlain,

With the key, and he knew how to deliver the key to his son;

He was rich and was married to a rich woman;

Married children, grandchildren;

He passed away and everyone remembers him sadly.

Kuzma Petrovich! Peace be upon him! -

What aces live and die in Moscow!..

Famusov, an old Moscow nobleman, deserved a general favor in the metropolitan circles. He is affable, courteous, witty, cheerful. But this is only the outer side. The author reveals the image of Famusov comprehensively. This is not only a hospitable host, but also a staunch serf-owner, a fierce opponent of enlightenment. “Take away all the books and burn them,” he says.

Chatsky, on the other hand, a representative of the “current century,” dreams of “putting a mind hungry for knowledge into science.” He is outraged by the rules established in the Famus society, since it regards a person by his origin and the number of serf souls. Famusov himself dreams of marrying off his daughter Sophia more profitably and tells her: “Ah! mother, do not finish the blow! Who is poor, he is not a couple for you. And then he adds: “Here, for example, we have been saying from time immemorial that honor is due to father and son; be poor, but if there are souls of two thousand family members - that and the groom. Unlike representatives of the Famus society, Chatsky longs for "sublime love, before which the whole world is dust and vanity."

In the relationship between Chatsky and the Famus society, the views of the "past century" on career, service, what is most valued in people are revealed. Famusov takes only relatives and friends to his service. He respects flattery and servility. He wants to convince Chatsky to serve, "looking at the elders", "to substitute a chair, raise a handkerchief." Chatsky objects to this: “I would be glad to serve, it’s sickening to serve.” He takes his job very seriously. And if Famusov treats her formally, bureaucratically (“signed, so off his shoulders”), then Chatsky says: “When I’m in business, I hide from fun, when I’m fooling around, I’m fooling around, and mixing these two crafts is the darkness of craftsmen, I don’t from among them."

Famusov worries about the affairs of only one side, fearing mortally, "so that a lot of them do not accumulate." He does not consider his servants to be people, he treats them rudely, he can sell them, exile them to hard labor. He calls them donkeys, chumps, calls Petrushka, Filka, Fomki. Thus, representatives of the Famus society treat service as a source of personal benefits, service to “persons”, and not to “cause”.

Chatsky, on the other hand, seeks to serve the fatherland, "the cause, not the individuals." He despises Silent, who is accustomed to "pleasing all people without exception - the owner, where I happen to live, the boss, with whom I will serve, his servant who cleans dresses, the porter, the janitor, to avoid evil, the janitor's dog, so that he is affectionate." Everything in Molchalin: both behavior and words - emphasize the cowardice of the immoral careerist. Chatsky bitterly speaks of such people: "The silent ones are blissful in the world!" It is Molchalin who suits his life best of all. He is also talented in his own way. He earned the favor of Famusov, the love of Sophia, received awards. He values ​​\u200b\u200btwo qualities of his character most of all: "moderation and accuracy." For Famusov and his circle, the opinion of the world is sacred and infallible, the most terrible thing is “what Princess Marya Aleksevna will say!”

Skalozub is another prominent representative of the Famus society. It was such a son-in-law that Famusov dreamed of having. After all, Skalozub is "and a golden bag, and aims for generals." This character contained the typical features of a reactionary of the Arakcheev time. “A wheezing, a strangled man, a bassoon, a constellation of maneuvers and mazurkas,” he is the same enemy of education and science as Famusov. “You won’t fool me with learning,” says the colonel.

It is quite obvious that the very atmosphere of the Famus society makes the representatives of the younger generation show their negative qualities. So, Sophia uses her sharp mind for outright lies, unwittingly spreads the rumor about Chatsky's madness. Sophia fully corresponds to the morality of the "fathers". And although she is a smart girl, with a strong, independent character, a warm heart, a dreamy soul, all the same, a false upbringing instilled in Sophia many negative qualities, made her a representative of generally accepted views in this circle. She does not understand Chatsky, does not appreciate his sharp mind, his criticality. She did not understand Molchalin, who "loves her according to her position." It is not her fault that Sophia has become a typical young lady of the Famusov environment. The society in which she was born and lived is to blame, “she is ruined, in stuffiness, where not a single ray of light, not a single stream of fresh air penetrated” (I. A. Goncharov. “A Million of Torments”).

One more character of the comedy is very interesting. This is Repetition. He is a completely unprincipled person, an "idle", but he was the only one who considered Chatsky a "high mind" and, not believing in his madness, called a pack of Famusov's guests "chimeras" and "game". Thus, he was at least one step above them all.

"So! I sobered up completely, ”says Chatsky at the end of the comedy. What is it - defeat or enlightenment? Yes, the finale of the comedy is far from being cheerful, but Goncharov is right when he said this: “Chatsky is broken by the amount of old strength, inflicting a mortal blow on it with the quality of fresh strength.” And I fully agree with Goncharov, who believes that the role of all the Chatskys is “passive”, but at the same time always “winning”. Chatsky opposes the society of ignoramuses and feudal lords. He fights against noble villains and sycophants, swindlers, rogues and scammers. In his famous monologue “And who are the judges? ..” he denounces the vile and vulgar world of Famus, in which the Russian people have become an object of purchase and sale, where landowners even exchanged serfs for dogs:

That Nestor of noble villains,

Crowd surrounded by servants;

Zealous, they are in the hours of wine and fight

Both honor and his life saved him more than once: suddenly

He traded three greyhounds for them!!!

Chatsky defends real human qualities: humanity and honesty, intelligence and culture. He defends the Russian people, his Russia, from everything inert and backward. Chatsky wants to see a literate, enlightened Russia. He defends his point of view in disputes, conversations with all the characters in the comedy "Woe from Wit", directing all his mind and determination to this. Therefore, the environment takes revenge on Chatsky for the truth, for trying to disrupt the usual way of life. The "past century", that is, the Famus society, is afraid of people like Chatsky, because they encroach on the way of life, which is the basis of their well-being. The last century, which Famusov admires so much, Chatsky calls the century of "submission and fear."

The Famus society is strong, its principles are firm, but Chatsky also has like-minded people. This is the cousin of Skalozub ("The rank followed him: he suddenly left the service, began to read books in the village"), the nephew of Princess Tugoukhovskaya. Chatsky himself constantly says “we”, “one of us”, thus speaking not only on his own behalf. So A. S. Griboedov wanted to hint to the reader that the time of the “past century” is passing, it is being replaced by the “current century”, strong, intelligent, educated.

Composition "The problem of comedy Woe from Wit"

Option 1

In the comedy "Woe from Wit" Griboyedov touches on many sensitive topics and problems of his era. For this reason, during the life of the author, the comedy was not allowed to be printed and staged in the theater. Below is an overview of the themes and problems of the comedy "Woe from Wit" by Griboedov, an analysis of the problems of the work.

“Woe from Wit” is quite extensive. In this work, Griboyedov touched on many topical topics of his time, which caused dissatisfaction with censorship. The main themes and problems of the comedy "Woe from Wit" are:

• serfdom and the cruelty of the landowners
• upbringing and education of the nobility
• pursuit of ranks and awards
• bureaucracy
• enmity towards “new people”, confrontation between “old” and “new” life
• Skalozubovshchina and Arakcheevshchina
• Decembrism
• liberalism
• frenchmania, love of everything foreign

N. K. Piksanov about the problems and themes of “Woe from Wit”:

“Woe from Wit” proclaimed then-bold judgments about serfdom, about the Russian nobility, about Catherine’s grandees and court customs, about bureaucracy, about Skalozubovism, about reactionary politics and superficial radicalism, about national dignity and outward Westernism, about new people and the enmity towards them of an inert society.

The close connection between "Woe from Wit" and Decembrism is obvious...

The satirical comedy "Woe from Wit" became a poetic declaration of Decembrism, its artistic document.

In Griboedov's play, attention is drawn to the repeated references to the free-thinking raznochinsk intelligentsia. ... obscurantism, enmity towards new people, Famusov's attacks on the spread of enlightenment are ridiculed ...

The comedy is full of echoes of the then public life: the “scientific committee” is mentioned, which persecuted books and the dissemination of enlightenment, Italian carbonari, talk about “cameras”, that is, about chambers of deputies, about Byron, “Voltairianism” and much more. There are sharp attacks against the abuses of serfdom ... A lot of sarcasm is directed against "nobles in the event" - favorites, against the "ardent servility" of courtiers "hunters to scoff everywhere", against "fathers of the fatherland", "robbery of the rich." There are many denunciations of the bureaucratic bureaucracy, to which one must “serve”, in front of which “one must not dare to have one’s own judgment” ... ”

(“A. S. Griboyedov. “Woe from Wit””, edited by N. K. Piksanov, series “Literary Monument”, publishing house “Nauka”, M. 1969)

V. N. Orlov about the main theme “Woe from Wit”:

“Chatsky's personal drama, his unrequited love for Sophia, is naturally included in the main theme of the comedy. Sophia, with all her spiritual inclinations, still belongs entirely to the Famus world. She cannot love Chatsky ...

Griboyedov left an indelible mark on the history of our national culture. In "Woe from Wit" he put forward the main social and ideological theme of his turning point - the theme of the irreconcilable enmity of the defenders of the old, inert way of life and the heralds of a new worldview, a new, "free life". This topic not only did not lose its significance throughout the entire 19th century, but, on the contrary, became more and more acute…”

Option 2

If A. S. Griboyedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit” were the only source from which one could learn about the socio-political life of Russia in the early 20s of the XIX century, then we, the readers, having mentally spent only one day in the house of a Moscow the feudal lord, a major official and hospitable owner Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov, could well feel the tense atmosphere in which Russian society lived after the Patriotic War of 1812.

It was restless in Russia. The nobility was divided. Some wanted to forget about the experience and continue to live in the old way, others - these were advanced youth - brought with them the spirit of freedom and freedom-loving from the West and would never agree to obey the obsolete order. Here, in the Famusov's house, "the meanest features of the past life" collided with the "current century", collided in an irreconcilable confrontation. And how could it be otherwise, if a young man burst into the musty atmosphere of an old manor's mansion like a hurricane, categorically refusing to obey the old foundations, to live like everyone else, to think like everyone else.

This is how two opposing camps are defined: on the one hand, the entire Famus society, on the other, Chatsky. And this confrontation is not age-related, but ideological. Molchalin, Skalozub, and even more so Sophia are closer in age to Chatsky than to Famusov, but completely share the views of the latter.

People gathered in Famusov's house who strive to defend their positions at all costs, to prove that the old order is just, and those who encroach on them are enemies, "carbonari". The dispute goes on throughout the day, any remark inflames the dispute. What causes antagonism? What problems does noble Moscow solve? The range of these problems is very wide. This is serfdom and the relationship between masters and their serfs, education and family education, understanding of civic duty, honor and human dignity, attitude towards public service, admiration for foreign fashions and attitude towards national culture.

To issues related to politics, morality, culture, that is, to everything that the country lives with, the Famus society and Chatsky not only approach differently - their positions are sharply opposed, and this confirms the ideological stratification of the nobility: after all, Chatsky (from a child - a child ) was brought up in the house of Famusov, he is also a Moscow nobleman, but his conflict with old Moscow cannot end in peace: he rejects all the old orders, declares war on them. That's all! He will not allow concessions. Famusov's society is in no way inferior to him: Chatsky's convictions threaten to undermine the very foundations of the existence of this society.

And it does not matter that the “past century” is represented by many people, and only Chatsky speaks on behalf of the “present century”. We learn that he has supporters, his views are shared by all progressive youth. It is on her behalf that he proclaims the advanced ideas of the time, ideas, in the name of the triumph of which the Decembrists will soon come to Senate Square. Material from the site //iEssay.ru

Griboyedov, a Decembrist by conviction, in his comedy brought two centuries face to face, and the positions of the parties are revealed in lively, emotional, as if even random clashes. But is it possible to inspire the Famusovs, the pufferfish, the whiplash, that serfdom is immoral, that the serfs Zephyrs and Cupids, the black “Arapka-girl” are the same people as their owners ?! Is it possible to explain to Molchalin what human dignity is; will he be able to understand that "to please all people without exception" is humiliating for a free human person? And who, besides Chatsky, cares that "French" upbringing, "mixing of languages" are destroying Russian culture; who can be convinced that a "Frenchman from Bordeaux" should not feel at home in Russia, as in his own province, and that "our smart, kind people" deserve a better fate?! What kind of Famusov would believe that public service is an opportunity to “serve the cause, not individuals”, that it is a shame to work according to the principle: “Signed - so off your shoulders” ?!

Chatsky's fiery speeches evoke anger, hatred for him, impotent rage. Why powerless? It would seem that there are many guardians of the old order, and in disputes with Chatsky they should feel confident: he is alone, at least alone in Famusov's house, and will be forced to retreat.

This is true, but it is very uncomfortable in a pre-stormy atmosphere for supporters of the obsolete old order. Hence the weapons of the doomed - gossip, slander, lies. And Chatsky is offended, but not broken. He fights boldly, openly, and never gives up. Forced to retreat, he will leave the stage unbroken.

Yes, Chatsky's fate is dramatic: “he is an advanced warrior, skirmisher and always a victim” (I. A.), but a victim who is destined to win in the future. Life has confirmed this conclusion. All the problems posed in Woe from Wit are resolved by History in favor of Chatsky and his supporters.

The main characters of Griboyedov's play "Woe from Wit":

Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov - manager at the government office. Not averse to dragging for young, pretty maids. "Obnoxious, restless, quick." Daughter makes it clear that the poor are not a couple for her, he intends to marry her to a rich man. He is "an old English club, a faithful member to the grave." Does not welcome education, sees all the evil in it.

Learning is the plague, learning is the cause

What is now, more than ever,

Crazy divorced people, and deeds, and opinions.

Sofia Pavlovna - his daughter. In love with Molchalin. She even worries about him when he fell off his horse. An ordinary Moscow young lady who received a home education. Reads books in French, plays the piano.

Lizanka - a maid, a lively girl, able to find a way out of a sensitive, difficult situation. He loves Petrusha, Famusov's servant. The Lord tries not to let himself in, although he is not rude.

Alexey Stepanovich Molchalin, Famusov's secretary, a nobleman from an impoverished family, a young man who lives in Famusov's house. He pretends to be in love with Sophia, hoping to marry her and receive a rich dowry. His surname characterizes him to the fullest. He realized long ago that in order to survive and achieve something

In my summers must not dare

Have your own opinion.

Naive Sophia endows Molchalin with those qualities that he does not have. Chatsky sneers at him:

Have you yet broken the silence of the press?

There were songs where brand new notebooks

He sees, sticks: please write off.

And yet, he will reach certain degrees,

After all, today they love the dumb.

Molchalin confesses to the maid Liza that he loves her. But there is little truth in this either. He harasses the serf girl at the call of nature, knowing that nothing will happen to him for this sin. Tikhonya Molchalin is cunning. As they say, there are devils in still waters. He does not love anyone, but only pretends to be in love in front of the girls.

When Sophia characterizes Molchalin in front of Chatsky, he sees a caricature in this characterization and comes to the conclusion that Sophia does not like Molchalin

He served with the father for three years,

He often gets angry for no reason,

And he will disarm him with silence,

From the kindness of the soul will forgive;

He is finally: compliant, modest, quiet,

Not a shadow of worry on your face

And there are no sins in my heart.

Everyone who characterizes Molchalin notes his silence, his ability to find an approach to everyone. Chatsky compares Molchalin with Zagoretsky, a well-known swindler.

Alexander Andreevich Chatsky returned from a trip, and immediately appeared in the house of Famusov, where Sophia lives - the subject of his love and long dreams. His credo is “I would be glad to serve, it’s sickening to serve.” Sophia notes his wit, turning into sarcasm:

He's nice

He knows how to laugh at everyone;

Chatting, joking.

However, characterizing Chatsky Skalozuba, Famusov remarks:

But if you want - it would be businesslike,

It's a pity, a pity, he's small with a head;

And he writes and translates well.

Colonel Skalozub, Sergei Sergeevich -"And the golden bag, and marks the generals." Typical martinet, arguing only on military topics.

Famous person, respectable,

And he picked up the darkness of distinction;

Out of years and an enviable rank,

Not today, tomorrow General.

In front of Skalozub, Famusov wriggles like a snake, tries to please him, dreams in the depths of his soul of marrying his daughter to him.

Natalya Dmitrievna, young lady loves her husband. Not stupid. She took her husband tightly in her arms, decides everything and even answers for him in conversations.

Platon Mikhailovich - her husband is a retired officer. "Now, brother, I'm not the one ...". Submitting to the cares of his wife, he misses.

Chatsky remarks to him:

For sure, you became the wrong one in a short time;

Was it not last year, at the end,

Did I know you in the regiment? only morning: foot in the stirrup

And you ride on a greyhound stallion;

Autumn wind blow, even in front, even from the rear.

Parsley - servant of Famusov. According to Famusov himself:

Parsley, you are always with a new thing,

With a torn elbow, -

Parsley is a clumsy and not agile bumpkin.

Prince Tugoukhovsky - besides, they are still deaf. Uses a hearing aid.

Princess, his wife, with six daughters - go to receptions to find suitors for their daughters. having learned that Chatsky is poor and does not serve, they refuse to invite him to dinner at their place.

Grandmother Countess speaks with a German accent.

Countess granddaughter - Evil, in girls for a century, God will forgive her.

Anton Antonovich Zagoretsky - he serves as a continuation of Molchalin. Through him, Griboyedov shows that sooner or later Molchalin will become the same, He will try to please those higher in the career ladder, but if possible, he will try to deceive.

Beware with him: endure much,

And do not sit down in the cards: he will sell.

He is a liar, a gambler, a thief.

But people tolerate him, knowing his deceitful nature, because Zagoretsky is a master of obliging, sometimes very useful.

Old woman Khlestova, sister-in-law of Famusov.

And auntie? all girl, Minerva?

All the maid of honor of Catherine the First?

Is the house full of pupils and moseks?

Sticks to antiquity. A typical Moscow lady.

d. N*. and Mr. D* - local gossips. The phrase casually thrown by Sophia was picked up and smashed.

Repetilov - positions himself with future revolutionaries, while he himself can only chat. The poem was written in 1822-1824, when revolutionary moods were ripening in the minds of the advanced nobility. Repetilov makes it clear to Chatsky that he participates in such meetings. Repetilov's remarks expressed Griboyedov's attitude to such meetings. "In 1824-1825, he was spiritually completely alien to political interests ...". He did not support the desire of the Decembrists to overthrow the existing system, did not believe in the possibility of such an overthrow of the autocracy.

Please, be quiet, I gave my word to be silent.

We have a society, and secret meetings,

On Thursdays. Secret alliance...

Repetilov obviously does not shine with intelligence, telling left and right about secret meetings at which he happens to be present and inviting people to them, essentially random. And there were many such random people, screamers who only knew how to argue over a bottle of champagne in secret Russian societies on the eve of the December uprising.

Chatsky's answers to Repetilov express Griboyedov's attitude towards these meetings:

These are emergency measures.

To drive away both you and your secrets.

At the end of the play, all the secrets and all the intrigues of the work are revealed. Chatsky finds out who Sophia is in love with. Before Sophia, the meanness of the soul of Molchalin is revealed, who, taking advantage of the darkness, quietly slipped away into his room. Chatsky finds out who he should thank for the fact that everyone declared him crazy. Frustrated and disappointed, he leaves Moscow.

Minor characters of the play "Woe from Wit":

Gorichi.

Hummins.

several talking servants.

Many guests of all sorts and their lackeys at the departure.

Waiters Famusova.

Alexander Sergeevich Griboedov is a diversified personality. He was a polyglot, musician, politician. He also proved himself to be a brilliant playwright. Truly the pinnacle of his work is the comedy "Woe from Wit". It is this work that has firmly entered the treasury of Russian classics. Thanks to comedy, the modern reader knows and remembers who he is. The description of the characters will allow you to best perceive and understand the work.

Alexander Andreevich Chatsky

A landowner who has about 400 serfs under his command. Chatsky is young and has no family of his own. He is an orphan. Chatsky's dad was once close friends with Famusov. Famusov raised the boy, but, having matured, Alexander Andreevich separated. Sophia Chatsky has a long-standing warm relationship. The girl is nice to him.

Chatsky is a member of the English Club, that is, he is a member of a prestigious public institution of that time. Alexander is smart and knows how to beautifully express his own thoughts. The young man always ridicules human stupidity. The tone of Chatsky's speech is harsh, he is sharp on the tongue. Society considers Alexander Andreevich "proud", not realizing that this is not pride, but the independence of a young man.

Since Chatsky's views on life are liberal, Famusov's society declares him crazy. For this reason, Alexander Andreevich is forced to leave the capital.

Useful video: the image of Chatsky in the comedy A.S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit"

Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov

At the time of the actions that are described by Griboyedov, the man buried his wife and is raising his daughter Sophia. He is already old enough, but he is cheerful and full of energy. Famusov lives with his daughter in the capital and serves as a manager in one of the institutions.

Taking advantage of his official position, Famusov promotes his relatives in the service and gives them undeserved awards and titles.

He has plenty, but, apparently, at the present time, things are not going as well as we would like, and therefore he is looking for a profitable party for his daughter. Famusov is also a member of the English Club. Pavel Afanasyevich is a windy man. This can be judged by the fact that he shows signs of attention to the maid Lizaveta. Famusov is often dissatisfied, grumbling with or without reason.

One of his favorite pastimes is scolding the servants. Knows how to flatter and please the right person. The characterization of Famusov is impossible without an emphasis on how important it is to him what society says about him.

Alexey Stepanovich Molchalin

An adult male who has served as Famusov's secretary for the past 3 years. Aleksey Stepanovich lives, so to speak, at the place of service, that is, in a separate room with his employer. Formally, Molchalin works in the archives, where, using his connections, Famusov arranged him. In the same place, Alexei Stepanovich goes to the ranks.

Molchalin is a flatterer and a sucker. He knows how to be pleasing to Famusov, who feeds him, waters him and promotes him through the ranks. Alexei Stepanovich has little money. Besides, he is provincial. Until the moment described in the work, this hero lived in Tver. His surname is speaking, it only emphasizes once again that the hero knows how much and with whom to talk.

Chatsky considers him a miserable person. By and large, Molchalin can be said to be modest. But his attitude towards Lisa suggests that nothing masculine is alien to him. The man is silent and does not make critical remarks to anyone. This is his tactic.

She, in his opinion, will allow him to achieve his goal. Chatsky considers him a liar, cunning and scoundrel. He maintains relations with Famusov's daughter for the sake of career advancement. Molchalin does not have feelings for her. He loves Lisa, but behaves very freely towards the girl.

Sofia Pavlovna Famusova

A young girl in her eighteenth year. A rich bride who can become a profitable match. Sophia is sweet and kind. The girl's mother died long ago, and she was raised by her father and a governess from Paris. The father gave his daughter a good family education.

Sophia learned to sing, play music, in a word, to do what a girl from a decent family should be able to do. Sophia loves to read, mostly French novels. The father does not share his daughter's passion for reading, he believes that this is a harmful occupation.

Sophia flirts easily with her boyfriends. For this, her father reproaches her and compares her with her dead mother. The girl is in love with Molchalin, but does not risk confessing this to Chatsky. At the same time, Sofya is very naive, because she does not understand that Alexei Stepanovich is using her for his own purposes.

Sophia's quote:

• "Happy hours do not watch ..."
• “Just think how capricious happiness is! It happens worse, get away with it ... "
• “Where so sweet! ... I don’t care what for him, what’s in the water ...”
• “He gloriously knows how to make everyone laugh; chatting, joking…”
• “I’m very windy, perhaps I did, and I know, and I’m sorry, oh where did I change it? ...”

Other actors

1. Sergei Sergeevich Skalozub. A soldier who rose to the rank of colonel. Rotates in the secular circles of Moscow society. He is in middle age, but not yet old. His appearance and timbre of voice say that he is a hero. The puffer is inherent in panache. Follows fashion. And he even tries to adjust the timbre of his voice to the requirements of the fashion of that time. Skalozub is quite limited in development. All his thoughts are only about military service. Sergei Sergeevich is not even able to properly support a conversation. Skalozub can be called a careerist, because this person has moved well up the career ladder in a short period of time. He has several military awards. Sergey Sergeevich is far from averse to marrying Sophia. According to Famusov, this is an excellent option. But Sophia does not look at the colonel. She likes Molchalin.
2. Lizanka. This is a servant in Famusov's house. About the same age as Sophia. The girl is very pretty and spontaneous. Tries to behave "decently". It is not conducted on gifts and promises of Molchalin. Superstitious and fearful. Lisa is often embroiled in the pranks of her mistress. For this reason, the girl is afraid of Famusov's wrath. Both Famusov and Molchalin are trying to enter into a relationship with her, but Lisa's heart is given to the barman Petrusha.
3. Repetilov. An old friend of Chatsky. Very awkward, and therefore ridiculous. He tried to make a career as an official, but failed. Lies constantly. In addition, Repetilov is superstitious. The man is kind, but leads a stupid life. In terms of mental development, he does not hold out. Moreover, Repetilov approaches himself self-critically and recognizes his own stupidity. He does not like to read. He does not treat his wife and children with care enough. He is a goof. Lost the estate at cards. On Thursdays, this man visits a certain secret society. Very lazy.
4. Anton Antonovich Zagoretsky. This man is a regular at all secular evenings. And he leaves only with the onset of morning. Zagoretsky likes to watch theatrical performances. He is a scammer and lies a lot. Anton Antonovich cheats in card games, and many people know about it. He loves to gossip. Zagoretsky likes to read fables, but he does not understand their allegorical meaning at all.
5. Anfisa Nilovna Khlestova. The woman is the sister of Famusov's now deceased wife. She is 65 years old. Khlestov of noble origin. Anfisa Nilovna is very angry. She needs to be in fashion. For this reason, she got herself a Spitz and goes with him to social events. Her maid is a dark-skinned arapka. And this is also a tribute to fashion. Whispering gossip. For this reason, Anfisa Nilovna knows everything about everyone. Education is not important to her. She doesn't read books. But she is always happy to play cards.
6. Platon Mikhailovich Gorich. This is an old friend of Chatsky. Now he is retired. Gorich's life is calm and measured. The man is married to a young woman, but this marriage cannot be called happy. Often yearns for the former military life. Platon Mikhailovich is bored, and he plays the flute. The wife takes care of the man like a weak child. His wife loves to attend social events, so Platon Mikhailovich travels with her. He is kind and gentle. Smart But at the same time, Platon Mikhailovich can be called henpecked.
7. Natalya Dmitrievna Gorich. She is the wife of Platon Mikhailovich. The woman is young and pretty. She likes to attend secular evenings. Keeps his spouse "under the heel." To some extent, their family is a projection of the possible development of relations between Sophia and Molchalin.
8. Pyotr Ilyich Tugoukhovsky. Aged and possibly ill. He and his wife have six daughters. His surname is telling. Tugoukhovsky "does not hear too much" or does not want to hear. Pyotr Ilyich, with his wife and daughters, goes to social events in order to find a profitable party for the heirs.
9. Marya Alekseevna Tugoukhovskaya. Wife of Pyotr Ilyich. She likes to command her husband, and he obeys her. Marya Alekseevna is an avid gambler, she loses to Khlestova at the evening. Tugoukhovskaya considers education useless. The main thing for a woman is what rank this or that person wears.
10. Countess Hryumina. There are two of them: a granddaughter and a grandmother. The author does not name them. But the surname leads to certain reflections. The granddaughter of evil, from the category of old maids. Tries to follow fashion. Gossip. Grandmother attends social events in order to successfully marry her granddaughter.
11. Parsley. This is a serf in the Famusovs' house. He is literate. Helps Famusov to keep records. Liza is in love with Petrushka.

Brief description of the heroes

An even more capacious and brief description of the heroes of the comedy can be presented in the form of a table:

no./p.	character	characteristic
1.	Chatsky	In love with Sophia. Smart, brilliantly educated. Witty and proud. Condemns the Famus society.
2.	Famusov	Wealthy. He wants to marry his only daughter Sophia to Skalozub. Considers rank and wealth important.
3.	Molchalin	A mean, hypocritical person. Serves with Famusov. It is important for him to please, so that later he can use it for his own purposes. Uses Sophia.
4.	Sofia	Young and windy. Well educated. He loves Molchalin and therefore does not notice that he is a scoundrel. Enjoys reading books.
5.	Puffer	Soldier. Important career. Undeveloped. Single. Famusov sees him as a profitable match for his own daughter.
6.	Lisa	Maid at the Famusovs. Not stupid, but windy. Likes its old master.
7.	Repetilov	Ridiculous and clumsy. A liar and a deceiver. Lost the estate at cards.
8.	Zagoretsky	Thief and gossip. Cheats at cards.
9	Khlestov	Old. He attends balls and pays tribute to fashion, which keeps a spitz and a black-haired girl in the house. He plays cards, most often dishonestly.
10.	gorichi	Husband and wife. He is old and considers the marriage a failure. Is under the influence of his wife. She is young and commands her husband.
11.	Tugoukhovskie	Husband and wife who travel to balls in the hope of finding suitable suitors for their six daughters.

Useful video: the system of images in the comedy "Woe from Wit"